![]() 09/06/2015 at 16:14 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
And so are yours.
![]() 09/06/2015 at 16:18 |
|
neat!
![]() 09/06/2015 at 16:20 |
|
Not bad!
![]() 09/06/2015 at 16:20 |
|
![]() 09/06/2015 at 16:21 |
|
Arms are heavy
There’s vomit on his sweater already,
Mom’s Spaghetti
![]() 09/06/2015 at 16:23 |
|
On a serious note it’s interesting how much of a difference having a slight lip like that between the wagon roof and the rear fascia makes. Looks so much better than the similar Magnum, because the Magnum is basically one surface on the rear of the car.
I’d totally rock one if they made it.
![]() 09/06/2015 at 16:31 |
|
Me likey
![]() 09/06/2015 at 16:37 |
|
Yes. All of the yes. Where do I sign?
Ill take the 392 as well.
![]() 09/06/2015 at 17:04 |
|
No because that doesn't look good at all.
![]() 09/06/2015 at 17:12 |
|
Blissful, simply blissful
![]() 09/06/2015 at 17:24 |
|
Oh fuck yeah...Mr. Gilles build this car!
![]() 09/06/2015 at 18:17 |
|
the D pillar is odd looking.
![]() 09/06/2015 at 20:39 |
|
Just the d? lol jk. Even the c doesn’t look like it belongs.
![]() 09/06/2015 at 23:58 |
|
It seems entirely impractical.
![]() 09/07/2015 at 06:30 |
|
only if manual.
![]() 09/07/2015 at 13:00 |
|
could’ve been so much better than it was. No sunroof for the front row, no rear wiper, no third seat, no 4-cylinder engine :(
![]() 09/08/2015 at 05:16 |
|
Indeed. Should have made the roofline straight and transitioned abruptly into a flat rear, like every wagon should.
That said, I’d still rock it!